Does United Airlines really support Voting Rights?
United Airlines has a terrible position on voting rights. They believe that only shareholders should be able to vote, which is terrible for a few reasons. First, it disenfranchises other stakeholders, such as employees and customers. This means that they have no say in how the company is run. Second, it means that the company is more likely to pursue short-term profits at the expense of long-term stability. This could lead to disastrous consequences for the company and its employees. Finally, it gives shareholders too much power, which could lead to decisions that are not in the best interests of the company or its employees.
Latest news
The January 6 corporate accountability index
After a violent mob stormed the Capitol building in January, hundreds of corporations pledged to make changes to their political giving. Some corporations pledged to withhold PAC funding to the 147 Republicans who voted to overturn the election, setting the stage for the riot. Other corporations said they were suspending all PAC activity and others promised to reevaluate their giving criteria in light of the violence.
by Popular Information
Some corporations break their silence on Texas' voter suppression bills
For months, members of the Texas legislature have been considering two bills (SB7 and HB6) that would make it harder to vote — particularly in areas with large Black populations like Harris County. In March, Popular Information
by Popular Information
Better Alternatives
SouthWest Airlines
Alaska Airlines
for their business.
Alaska Airlines is in support of the Voting Rights Act because it's good for their business. The Voting Rights Act ensures that all Americans have an equal opportunity to vote, which is important for a company like Alaska Airlines that wants to serve a diverse customer base. The Voting Rights Act also protects against discrimination in voting, which is another important issue for a company like Alaska Airlines.