Does Kiehl's really support Animal Rights?

http://kiehls.com

Kiehl's is owned by L'Oréal

L'Oréal has a poor position on animal rights. The company does not seem to recognize the ethical concerns around using animals in testing, and has not made any public commitments to reducing or eliminating its use of animals.

Poor

Latest news

Better Alternatives

Drunk Elephant

N/A

Biossance

Good
Biossance is a cruelty-free brand, meaning that they do not test their products on animals. They are also a vegan brand, meaning that all of their products are vegan.

Algenist

Poor
Algenist does not have an official position on animal rights, but the company's philosophy is that animals should not be harmed unnecessarily in the development or testing of products. Algenist does not believe that animals should be used in cosmetics testing, and the company is working to develop alternative methods for product testing.

Tatcha

Good
Tatcha is a company that does not test their products on animals. They also do not use any animal-derived ingredients in their products.

Youth to the People

Good
The Youth to the People position on animal rights is that animals should have the same rights as humans. They believe that animals should not be used for food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation. They believe that animals should be treated with respect and that they should not be harmed in any way.

Glow Recipe

Good
Glow Recipe is vegan and does not test on animals. They are also cruelty-free, which means they do not sell in China where animal testing is required by law.

Mario Badescu

N/A

Kate Somerville

Good
. Kate Somerville is pro-animal rights. She believes that animals should be treated humanely, and that they should not be used for testing or research purposes unless it is absolutely necessary. She also believes that animals should not be raised for food or clothing unless it is done in a humane way. Kate Somerville's position on animal rights is good because it ensures that animals are treated fairly and humanely.

Goop

N/A

FARMACY BEAUTY

Good
Farmacy is vegan and cruelty-free, meaning they do not test on animals and do not use any animal products in their formulations.

OUAI

N/A

Lush Cosmetics

Good
Lush Cosmetics is a company that does not test their products on animals. They also do not sell in China, where animal testing is required by law for cosmetics. Lush believes that animals should not be used for testing as it is cruel and inhumane.

Shiseido

N/A

Jack Black

Good
Jack Black is a vegan, and as such, he likely believes in animal rights. As a vegan, he likely believes that animals should not be used for food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation. He may also believe that animals should have the same rights as humans with regard to living in a humane environment and being protected from abuse.

Dove

Good
Dove is a company that sells soap. They have a strong position on animal rights and are cruelty-free. This means that they do not test their products on animals and do not use any ingredients that have been tested on animals.

Clinique

Poor
Clinique does not have a stated position on animal rights, but the company's poor track record in this area suggests that it does not prioritize the issue. For example, Clinique has been criticized for testing its products on animals, and it has been accused of selling products in China that are tested on animals.

Sunday Riley

Good
Sunday Riley believes that animals have a right to live without being harmed. She is a strong advocate for animal rights and believes that humans have a responsibility to protect animals from harm. She is also a proponent of plant-based diets, which she believes are better for both animals and the environment.

Instead of searching, get our Chrome extension to discover cruelty-free brands automatically!