Does Bioeffect really support Animal Rights?

Bioeffect is not particularly outspoken about animal rights, but the company's position can be inferred as being poor. The company does not appear to make any public statements about opposing animal testing, and its products are not vegan or cruelty-free.
Latest news
Better Alternatives

Mario Badescu

Tatcha
Tatcha is a company that does not test their products on animals. They also do not use any animal-derived ingredients in their products.

Kate Somerville
.
Kate Somerville is pro-animal rights. She believes that animals should be treated humanely, and that they should not be used for testing or research purposes unless it is absolutely necessary. She also believes that animals should not be raised for food or clothing unless it is done in a humane way. Kate Somerville's position on animal rights is good because it ensures that animals are treated fairly and humanely.

Fresh

Fenty Beauty

Kiehl's

AmorePacific
AmorePacific does not appear to have a strong position on animal rights. The company does not seem to have made any public statements on the issue, and it does not appear to have any policies or programs in place to protect animals. This is troubling, as animal rights are a fundamental issue in the ethical treatment of animals. Without a clear commitment to animal rights, AmorePacific is likely to engage in animal testing and other harmful practices that harm animals.

Drunk Elephant

Biossance
Biossance is a cruelty-free brand, meaning that they do not test their products on animals. They are also a vegan brand, meaning that all of their products are vegan.

Goop

Shiseido

Tata Harper Skincare
Tata Harper skincare is a cruelty-free brand, meaning that they do not test their products on animals. They also do not use any animal-derived ingredients in their products. Tata Harper is also a certified B-Corp, meaning that they meet rigorous standards of social and environmental performance, accountability, and transparency.

Dr. Jart+

BareMinerals
BareMinerals does not test their products on animals and they also do not sell in China where animal testing is required by law.

Clinique
Clinique does not have a stated position on animal rights, but the company's poor track record in this area suggests that it does not prioritize the issue. For example, Clinique has been criticized for testing its products on animals, and it has been accused of selling products in China that are tested on animals.

Glow Recipe
Glow Recipe is vegan and does not test on animals. They are also cruelty-free, which means they do not sell in China where animal testing is required by law.

Caudalie
Caudalie does not have an official position on animal rights, but the company's CEO has spoken out against the practice of testing cosmetics on animals. He argues that there are better, more reliable methods for testing cosmetics that don't involve harming animals. However, Caudalie does still sell products that were tested on animals in the past. This position is poor because it fails to take a stand against the use of animals in cosmetics testing, and it continues to profit from products that were tested on animals.

La Prairie

Youth to the People
The Youth to the People position on animal rights is that animals should have the same rights as humans. They believe that animals should not be used for food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation. They believe that animals should be treated with respect and that they should not be harmed in any way.

Algenist
Algenist does not have an official position on animal rights, but the company's philosophy is that animals should not be harmed unnecessarily in the development or testing of products. Algenist does not believe that animals should be used in cosmetics testing, and the company is working to develop alternative methods for product testing.

FARMACY BEAUTY
Farmacy is vegan and cruelty-free, meaning they do not test on animals and do not use any animal products in their formulations.