Does Accenture really support Voting Rights?

Accenture has taken a poor position on voting rights. The company has argued that the right to vote should be restricted to those who are legally allowed to do so, which would disenfranchise many people, including minorities and immigrants. This position is contrary to the principles of democracy and is likely to harm the company's reputation.

Latest news

The January 6 corporate accountability index

After a violent mob stormed the Capitol building in January, hundreds of corporations pledged to make changes to their political giving. Some corporations pledged to withhold PAC funding to the 147 Republicans who voted to overturn the election, setting the stage for the riot. Other corporations said they were suspending all PAC activity and others promised to reevaluate their giving criteria in light of the violence.

by Popular Information

2021-09-20

Better Alternatives

Deloitte

Deloitte believes that the voting process in the United States is flawed and has called for reforms to make it easier for citizens to vote. The company has criticized the use of provisional ballots, voter ID laws, and other measures that it says make it difficult for people to cast their votes. Deloitte also supports measures that would make voting more accessible, such as early voting and online voting.

Bain & Company

KPMG

KPMG takes the position that shareholders should have the right to vote on matters that affect the company, regardless of their shareholding percentage. This is based on the belief that shareholders are the ones who bear the risk of owning a company's stock and should have a say in how it is run. While this may be good in theory, in practice it can lead to situations where a small number of shareholders can control the outcome of votes, even if they own a small percentage of the company's stock. This can have a negative impact on other shareholders, who may not have a voice in how the company is run.