Does Abbott Laboratories really support Voting Rights?
Abbott Laboratories has a poor position on voting rights. The company has a history of fighting to keep its workers from unionizing and has been accused of suppressing the votes of its employees. Abbott also has a history of opposing shareholder resolutions on social and environmental issues.
Related brands
Pedialyte
Pedialyte is owned by Abbott Laboratories
Pediasure
Pediasure is owned by Abbott Laboratories
Ensure
Ensure is owned by Abbott Laboratories
Latest news
Better Alternatives
Johnson & Johnson
3M
for the company.
3M believes that all shareholders should have an equal say in the company's direction, regardless of their share class or ownership stake. This position is good for the company because it allows all shareholders to have a voice in the company's future and helps to ensure that the best interests of all shareholders are considered when making decisions.
Medtronic PLC
Boston Scientific
for the company.
Boston Scientific supports voting rights because it is good for the company. Voting rights ensure that all shareholders have a say in important company decisions, which can help to improve the company's performance. Additionally, voting rights can help to protect shareholders' interests by ensuring that they have a voice in decisions that could potentially harm their investments.
Danaher Corp.
Stryker Corp.
Becton, Dickinson and Co.
